Both trade dress rights and design patents can be used to protect product designs and packaging. But is one a better form of IP protection than the other? Leading practitioners debated the merits of trade dress and design patent rights, including:
- Which IP right works best for different types of products and industries?
- When is it worth devoting the time and resources to procure a design patent?
- What is the appropriate test for design patent infringement: the “point of novelty” test or “the ordinary observe test”?
- Which IP right is more powerful for enforcement and as a remedy in litigation?
Panelists for this session include: Nancy Lee Carter, Senior Counsel- Trademark & Copyright, Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Karen Feisthamel, Senior Legal Counsel – Intellectual Property, CVS Caremark Corporation; Cynthia Franecki, Senior Counsel, IP Litigation Practice; Kamau King, Worldwide Licensing & Retail Operations Counsel, The Coca-Cola Company; Gregory Norrod, Partner, IP Litigation Practice; Daniel Shulman, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Assistant General Counsel, Pactiv Corporation.
Related Insights
January 2, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Federal Court Denies Claim that Franchisor Is a Joint Employer with Franchisee
A federal court recently dismissed employment discrimination claims against a franchisor asserted by its franchisees’ employee after…
December 29, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
Mexican January 2026 Tariff Tsunami: Maquilas Aren’t Immune
On January 1, 2026, Mexico will increase its general import tariff rate (known as the most favored nation (MFN) rate). The increase will be in the range of five to fifty percent, impacting 1,463 eight-digit tariff lines encompassing thousands of products originating in countries with which Mexico does not have a free trade agreement (FTA or the measure).
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.