Guns, But No Bullets: California Supreme Court Limits Powers of Medical Staff Peer Review Hearing Officer in Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical Center
April 17, 2009
Shirley P. Morrigan and Nathaniel M. Lacktman analyze the recent California Supreme Court decision in the Mileikowsky case and offer advice for medical staff peer review bodies in light of the ruling.
Reprinted with permission from the American Health Lawyers Association. Article first appeared in the April 17, 2009 issue of Health Lawyers Weekly (Vol. VII, Issue 15).
Author(s)
Related Insights
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
New York Further Amends CPLR §2106, Broadening and Clarifying the Use of Affirmations in Lieu of Affidavits and Other Sworn Statements
The evolution of Section 2106 from a narrow, procedural shortcut into a comprehensive substitute for affidavits, verifications, and other sworn statements marks a significant modernization and streamlining of New York practice, with this new amendment reflecting the legislature’s intent to align more with federal practice while preserving New York’s own unique statutory requirements.
January 9, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Navigating Workplace AI When Federal, State Policies Clash
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints