Overly and Tantleff Quoted on Yahoo Data Breach
September 27, 2016
Fortune | The Wall Street Journal
Partner Aaron Tantleff was quoted in a Fortune Artikel, „Yahoo Could Face Legal Trouble Over Delay in Disclosing Hack,” on September 23, 2016. The article discussed the Yahoo data breach and questioned why the company waited nearly two years before informing the public. Tantleff commented on the varying state notice periods and explained how some states require companies to notify customers about data breaches within 30 or 45 days, while others use more general language, such as “as soon as expedient.” However, Tantleff said state laws make allowance for law enforcement proceedings, meaning it’s possible Yahoo informed the FBI about the hack and the agency instructed the company to wait before going public with the news.
In addition, Partner Michael Overly was quoted in a Wall Street Journal Artikel, „Yahoo Breach: Senators Demand Answers,” on September 27, 2016. The article discussed the letter from six Democratic U.S. senators to Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seeking answers about Yahoo’s data breach, specifically the timeline and a list of affected services. Overly explained that it is not uncommon for consumers to be notified years after a breach, but the delay can create problems for consumers and diminish the intended effects of breach-notification laws. He was quoted saying, “If the time delay between breach and the company learning about it is two years, the horse has not only escaped the barn, but the barn has fallen from disuse.”
In addition, Partner Michael Overly was quoted in a Wall Street Journal Artikel, „Yahoo Breach: Senators Demand Answers,” on September 27, 2016. The article discussed the letter from six Democratic U.S. senators to Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seeking answers about Yahoo’s data breach, specifically the timeline and a list of affected services. Overly explained that it is not uncommon for consumers to be notified years after a breach, but the delay can create problems for consumers and diminish the intended effects of breach-notification laws. He was quoted saying, “If the time delay between breach and the company learning about it is two years, the horse has not only escaped the barn, but the barn has fallen from disuse.”
Menschen
Verwandte Nachrichten
3. Dezember 2025
In den Nachrichten
Vanessa Miller bewertet die Auswirkungen der Automobilzölle auf die Lkw-Branche
Vanessa Miller, Partnerin bei Foley & Lardner LLP, diskutierte in dem Artikel „Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers” (Zölle lassen das Transportvolumen für Autotransporte schwanken) von TruckingDive die anhaltenden Störungen der Nachfrage im Güterkraftverkehr, die durch die jüngsten Automobilzölle verursacht wurden.
28. November 2025
In den Nachrichten
Cassandra Aubert bewertet die unterschiedlichen Urteile der Berufungsgerichte zur Rückforderungsbefugnis der SEC
Cassandra Aubert, Associate bei Foley & Lardner LLP, äußerte sich in dem Artikel „SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case” (Die Befugnis der SEC zur Rückforderung illegaler Gewinne in Gefahr, da Richter den Fall prüfen) von Bloomberg Law zu der zunehmenden Kontrolle der Rückforderungsbefugnis der US-Börsenaufsichtsbehörde SEC.
25. November 2025
In den Nachrichten
Gregory Husisian analysiert den Zollfall vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten
Gregory Husisian, Partner bei Foley & Lardner LLP, sprach in einem Videointerview mit SupplyChainBrain über den Fall vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten bezüglich der von der Trump-Regierung gemäß dem International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) verhängten Zölle und über Optionen, die die Regierung in Betracht ziehen könnte, sollte das Gericht diese für unzulässig erklären.