David J. Wenthold
Assoziiert
David Wenthold is committed to helping clients find creative arguments and solutions to complex litigation matters. He is an associate based in the Milwaukee office where he is a member of the firm’s Commercial Litigation Practice Group. David has briefed complex issues before both trial and appellate courts.
David has extensive clerkship experience in the federal court system. He served as a law clerk for three federal judges: Judge N. Randy Smith (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit), Judge Amul Thapar (United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit), and Judge Benjamin Beaton (United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky). While in law school, David served as a law clerk for the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, a judicial intern for then-Judge Brian Hagedorn on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, and a legal intern for the Office of the Wisconsin Solicitor General.
Repräsentative Erfahrung
- Defended the City of Milwaukee in the Eastern District of Wisconsin against a False Claims Act suit concerning the City’s administration of federal housing grants, obtaining dismissal of relators’ claims with prejudice.
- Defended and obtained judgment on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in favor of a client in False Claims Act suit.
- Successfully defended against remand and dismissal motions in the District of Hawaii.
Zugehörigkeiten
- Member of the Federalist Society
Präsentationen und Veröffentlichungen
- Author, “Murr and Wisconsin: The Badger State’s Take on Regulatory Takings,” 102 MARQ. L. REV. 261 (2018)
Foley vertritt Hospiz-Koalition in Rechtsstreit gegen CMS-Sonderprogramm
Foley sichert sich einen Präzedenzsieg bei der Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die Qui Tam-Bestimmungen des False Claims Act
Nutzung der Indikatoren der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation für Zwangsarbeit zur Beseitigung von Zwangsarbeit aus Lieferketten
Foley erreicht Abweisung der Klage gegen die Stadt Milwaukee im Rahmen des FCA-Verfahrens
Der Seventh Circuit greift den Fall zum Verbot der Abwerbung von Franchisenehmern wieder auf und hält eine Behandlung per se für möglich
