Partner James Munisteri Discusses Creative Sanctions with Law360

18 August 2014 News

Law360 highlighted ways litigants are getting creative to impose meaningful sanctions on wealthy companies. State law requires that court-imposed sanctions be proportional and bear a direct relationship to a party's objectionable conduct. As a consequence, financial penalties are typically modest, except in egregious cases where the bad actor is usually a repeat offender. That's what makes creative punishment options alluring.

"The most impactful sanctions are the ones that affect the lawsuit itself," said Gardere Partner James G. Munisteri. "Especially if there are multiple lawsuits pending that involve the same issues."

But there are limits. As with monetary sanctions, the punishment must fit the crime if an alternative penalty is to be upheld on appeal. Imposing the "death penalty" on a party's case is viewed by most courts as an option of last resort because the extreme measure can violate constitutional rights if a lesser remedy was available. It usually pays to come up several options for a court to consider, Mr. Munisteri said.

Subscribers can access the full article here.

Related Services

Insights

Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
30 July 2021
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
$4.24M Now the Average Cost Per Data Breach!
30 July 2021
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Podcast Episode 56: All Things Summer Associate Recruiting
30 July 2021
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Podcast to Live Panel Discussion
29 July 2021
Foley Career Perspectives
30th Annual Law of Product Distribution & Franchise Seminar
29 September | 7 & 20 October 2021
Milwaukee | Chicago | Dallas
7th National Telehealth Summit
4-5 October 2021
Miami Beach, FL
AHLA Fraud & Compliance Forum
21-22 September 2021
Baltimore, MD
2nd Clinical Trial Agreements Forum
16-17 September 2021
Online Livestream