IT Outsourcing Giants

16 September 2008 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

HP’s recent purchase of EDS changed the landscape for the Outsourcing market with another computer/printer manufacturer providing IT outsourcing services. Since EDS was one of the first companies in the outsourcing business, and a giant at that, it seems interesting that HP acquired EDS and now competes with the likes of IBM, BearingPoint, ACS, CSC, Accenture, and Tata. Is it a coincidence that so many outsourcing giants go by 3-4 letter initials? Unlikely, but all of the companies have to offer similar services to be competitive.

Outsourcing Agreements

One signal feature of every outsourcing agreement is that they will end. They are all for a finite period and three things will happen at the end of the agreement:

(1) the customer will take over the outsourced services;
(2) the customer will migrate to another outsourcing vendor; or
(3) the customer will sign a new agreement with the same vendor.

So unless the outsourcing vendor remains the same there is an absolute need for the outsourcing agreement to be completely explicit about what happens to software licenses (and related maintenance and support), how the customer data is returned or moved, and what services and costs will be incurred to help migrated the software and services at the end of the agreement.

What happens if the Outsourcing Agreements are Unclear?

A few years ago a client terminated an outsourcing agreement to consolidate its IT operations with a new parent company. After asking the outsourcing vendor for its data so it could move on the outsourcing vendor asked where the customer wanted the tractor trailer to deliver the customer’s printed data. When the customer said it needed electronic copies the old vendor put a multi-million price tag on the electronic data. The customer had no choice but to pay the outrageous fee to get its data, and then thousands of dollars in litigation to get the money back later (which it did ultimately).
 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA