Too Social? Hard to Believe!

04 September 2008 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

The growth and proliferation of social networking on the Internet has hit a new wall- too much social networking. Recent reports that Facebook has disabled members for too much social networking apparently is a reaction to concerns of suspicious behavior which really boils down to using the site too much. Facebook’s 100 million users are susceptible to spam. Phishing, and malware just like all webmail services. It seems ironic that there could do too much social networking, but the report of 64 large-scale spam attacks is not too surprising. So it seems that social networks are being abused like the rest of the Internet.

+97 Billion Emails a Day

No one is surprised by the proliferation of email in general, so when IDC announced in April 2007 that of the 97 billion email per day about 40 billion were spam. The impact of the Internet on social change continues at a pace unknown in the past and difficult to actually predict too far into the future. From an Information Technology perspective management of email at with growth rate makes planning difficult and expensive.

Growth of Emails on e-Discovery

Since every lawsuit filed has some electronic evidence, this proliferation of email and social networking makes e-Discovery more perplexing. Not just in volume, but locating the evidence to begin with. For instance, even though employees rely on their company email systems, they also use Facebook for social networking and webmail such as AOL, Hotmail, or gmail. So in the context of e-Discovery lawyers are now confronted with finding and searching these sites for evidence. Issuing subpoenas to Facebook, AOL, Hotmail, and gmail to get records is not as simple as requesting opposing parties to search and produce records from internal email systems.
 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA