CFPB Issues Final Rules Governing Enforcement Actions at the Bureau

08 June 2012 Consumer Class Defense Counsel Blog

This past Wednesday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or the “Bureau”) issued Final Rules which provide greater clarity into the process by which it will adjudicate consumer protection provisions set forth in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Bureau summarized its primary goal of “creat[ing] an adjudicatory process that provides for the expeditious resolution of claims while ensuring that parties who appear before the Bureau receive a fair hearing.” The Bureau modeled its process after that of the Federal Trade Commission and the Securities Exchange Commission; processes that were previously implemented with a similar stated purpose.

Under the process set forth in the Final Rule, a hearing officer will recommend a decision in each administrative adjudication. Any party will then have a right to contest the recommended decision “by filing a notice of appeal and perfecting the appeal by later filing an opening brief.” In the event that an appeal is not timely noticed or perfected, the Director will have the option of either adopting as final the hearing officer recommendation or ordering further briefing on any fact finding or legal determination. The hearing officer will also have authority to hear any party’s dispositive motion subject to the same appeal process as that applicable to a final recommendation. The Final Rule also sets a deadline of 300 days from service of the notice of charges or 90 days after briefing is complete to issue a recommendation. The Final Rule provides for extensions beyond the 300-day time limit in rare circumstances.

If a recommendation is appealed to the Director or the Director orders additional briefing on his or her own, the Office of Administrative Adjudication will notify the parties that the case has been submitted for final Bureau decision which the Director must issue within 90 days after submission of reply briefs.

The Final Rule also implements a discovery procedure by which the Bureau’s Office of Enforcement will provide any party to an adjudication proceeding an opportunity to review certain categories of materials obtained by the Office of Enforcement in the course of its investigation as well as non-privileged documents created by the Bureau. Pursuant to the Final Rule, the Bureau retains the obligation to turn over any “materially exculpatory information in the Office of Enforcement’s Possession.”

In sum, the Final Rule implements a procedure that has been time tested by other federal enforcement bodies and appears to strike a fair balance, procedurally, between a fair adjudication process and one that moves along with some degree of efficiency. Of course, it is impossible to tell what the implications of such an process when many of the provisions in Title X remain undefined, as do the Bureau’s intended targeted entities and transactions once it steps up its enforcement efforts.

 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights