A class action suit filed in New Mexico alleges Facebook violates unfair competition laws by promoting the sale of counterfeit goods from China which are purportedly officially licensed by the National Football League (NFL). On October 22, 2012 Inkies Sports, Inc (dba Krystal’s NFL Shoppe) sued Facebook, Adsage, DHgate, and Doe Defendants 1-100 in US District Court in Albuquerque, New Mexico on behalf of retailers and wholesalers of officially licensed NFL apparel. These counterfeit ads encourage consumers to believe “that they can order a genuine, NFL licensed jersey for $22, as opposed to the MSRP (Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price) of $100 to $300.”
Krystal’s Complaint includes these allegations:
Ad for counterfeit goods are regularly displayed on Krystal’s Facebook page, leading even loyal customers to question whether these ads are supported, or even sponsored by Krystal’s.
Indeed Krystal’s has received numerous comments and complaints from its customers regarding the advertisements, with consumers relating that because the advertisement was on Krystal’s Facebook page, they were led to believe that Krystal’s was somehow responsible for, or in league with, the counterfeiters.
As such, Krystal’s has inadvertently been placed in the untenable position of actually lending credence to the counterfeit ads, by virtue of Facebook’s display of those advertisements on Krystal’s page.
Krystal’s has lodged public and private complaints with Facebook, but has received no meaningful reply or response.
Facebook’s need to generate ad revenue should not encourage counterfeiters, but based on Krystal’s lawsuit one would conclude otherwise.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.