FICA Taxes on Certain Severance Pay May Be Refundable

15 October 2012 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

The IRS may owe FICA tax refunds on severance payments made by employers to laid-off or terminated employees as part of reductions in workforce. Every employer that paid severance to laid-off employees as part of a reduction in workforce in 2009 or later years needs to consider filing FICA tax refund claims.The Sixth Circuit held that certain types of severance pay, known as “supplemental unemployment compensation benefits” or “SUB payments,” are not subject to FICA tax. United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., No. 10-1563 (6th Cir. September 7, 2012). The Sixth Circuit Court, rejecting the definition of SUB payments advanced in IRS revenue rulings, held that the definition of SUB payments in Internal Revenue Code § 3402(o) controls, specifically not following the Federal Circuit’s decision in CSX Corp. v. United States, 518 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Expect the government to either ask the Sixth Circuit for rehearing or, if the government does not ask or the Sixth Circuit denies the request, ask the United States Supreme Court to overturn the Sixth Circuit, as the Sixth and Federal Circuits do not agree. Short of a decision by the Supreme Court, expect the government to continue to litigate this issue in other circuits in an attempt to avoid paying millions of dollars of refund claims.

In order to meet the definition of a SUB payment under Internal Revenue Code § 3402(o), the payments must be: (1) made to an employee; (2) made pursuant to an employer plan; (3) made because of an employee’s involuntary separation from employment (whether or not such separation is temporary); (4) made as a direct result of a reduction in force, the discontinuance of a plant or operation, or other similar conditions; and (5) included in the employee’s gross income.

Employers that made severance payments in 2009 meeting the § 3402(o) definition of SUB payments should consider filing claims for FICA tax refunds. While the IRS is likely to continue to deny these refund claims and litigate this issue, employers with potential refund claims must file claims prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations for filing FICA tax refund claims for timely filed 2009 Forms 941 expires on April 15, 2013. Whether employers should file claims for refund for years after 2009 depends upon the ultimate resolution of the issue.

In addition, until this issue is finally resolved, employers should continue to withhold and remit FICA taxes on severance pay (including employers with employees in the Sixth Circuit (Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee)). The IRS’ current position is clear. Employers are liable for 100 percent of the FICA taxes, and there is little or no recourse against former employees for their share of the FICA taxes. Employers can subsequently file refund claims after final resolution of this issue.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA