To Pump or Not to Pump — Nursing Mothers and Breastfeeding Protection Laws

01 October 2012 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

There does not seem to be a manner of enforcing the express breast milk provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Act) through the court system. A federal court in Iowa made this finding in Salz v. Casey’s Marketing Co.. The Act provides protection to nursing mothers at their place of employment by requiring that employers provide a reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child in a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public. The Act also provides that employers are not required to compensate an employee for the time spent expressing breast milk.In Salz, the employee filed a claim against her employer for violation of the Act because her employer failed to provide her with a private place to express breast milk. In her complaint, the employee alleged that when she returned to work at a convenience store after giving birth, she was told she could use the store’s office as a private place to express breast milk. While her breast was exposed, she noticed that there was an operating security camera in the office. After bringing the issue to her employer’s attention, the employer responded that she could place a plastic bag over the camera. The employer refused to provide any other accommodations, such as an alternative location to express breast milk or disabling the security camera. The employee also alleged that after she complained to her employer about the breastfeeding policy, she was retaliated against and had to quit her job.

With regard to enforcement mechanisms for violations of the Act, the Act provides that an employer who violates the express breast milk provisions shall be liable to the employee in the amount of her unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation. However, as the Salz court recognized, since employers are not required to compensate employees for time spent expressing breast milk and the enforcement provision is limited to unpaid wages, there does not appear to be a manner of enforcing these provisions of the Act. The court therefore dismissed the nursing mother’s claim for violations of the Act. The court, however, refused to dismiss the employee’s retaliation and constructive discharge claims.

 The Department of Labor (DOL) also has recently recognized that nursing mothers are limited to filing claims for violations of the Act directly with the DOL, not the courts. After the DOL first investigates the complaint, it can then determine whether to seek injunctive relief or damages in federal court. Although the DOL has acknowledged that it will attempt to give priority to these complaints, nursing mothers may not be able to obtain injunctive relief fast enough. Instead, nursing mothers may be faced with the decision of whether to continue nursing or quit their jobs.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights