Court Rules on What eMail Backup Means

05 November 2012 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

What is meant by email backup was determined in a recent ruling that decided once the email had been read that it was not in backup storage and therefore the protection of the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA) no longer applies. The South Carolina Supreme Court recently ruled in Jennings v. Jennings that after emails were read, the husband could no longer use the SCA to limit access. The majority of the Court ruled:

After opening them, Jennings left the single copies of his e-mails on the Yahoo! server and apparently did not download them or save another copy of them in any other location. We decline to hold that retaining an opened e-mail constitutes storing it for backup protection under the Act. The ordinary meaning of the word "backup" is "one that serves as a substitute or support." Merriam-Webster Dictionary, http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/backup. Thus, Congress’s use of "backup" necessarily presupposes the existence of another copy to which this e-mail would serve as a substitute or support. We see no reason to deviate from the plain, everyday meaning of the word "backup," and conclude that as the single copy of the communication, Jennings’ e-mails could not have been stored for backup protection.

Under the SCA there are two types of records “electronic communication service” (ECS) which are controlled internally within a business like on company owned computers and servers. The other “remote computing service” (RCS) which are stored remotely like at gmail, Facebook, and telephone records at AT&T.

Even though the SCA was designed for telephone records in 1986 Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and under the SCA, ISPs provide RCS as a result ISPs have relied on the SCA to limit providing postings and emails unless the owner of that data approves. As well, the SCA only allows a civil suit if the emails accessed were in “electronic storage.” Electronic storage is defined in the SCA as:

(A) any temporary, intermediate storage of a wire or electronic communication incidental to the electronic transmission thereof; and (B) any storage of such communication by an electronic communication service for the purposes of backup protection of such communication.

This South Carolina Supreme Court ruling may impact other Courts around the US, and as a result change the use of the SCA, so stay tuned.
 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services