What's Next for the National Labor Relations Board and Employers?

04 February 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

As we reported last week , the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals recently invalidated President Obama’s purported recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board made in January 2012, rendering the Board without a quorum and potentially unable to conduct much of its normal business. As the implications of the decision continue to develop, we look at what employers might do to take advantage of the decision.For its part, the Board insists that it is business as usual. Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce has issued a statement “respectfully disagree[ing]” with the D.C. Circuit’s decision. Chairman Pearce also has attempted to limit the decision’s damage to the Board, insisting that it “applies to only one specific case.” Similarly, President Obama’s press secretary claimed that the decision was limited to “one court, one case, one company” and that it would have no impact on the ongoing operations of the Board.

Despite the aggressive posture from the executive branch, it is not clear how the Board can continue operating in the face of this ruling. The Board persists in functioning with the same members whose appointments the D.C. Circuit just invalidated. Additionally, Board decisions are not self-enforcing, meaning that employers (and unions) are required to comply with them only if a court “enforces,” or approves, the Board’s decision. By law, employers can appeal any Board decision to the D.C. Circuit, which just found the Board to be acting outside of constitutional bounds. Therefore, we think it is highly likely that the D.C. Circuit will continue to rule that the appointments were unconstitutional and refuse to enforce any order from the Board. As a consequence, unless the Supreme Court reverses the recent decision or the entire D.C. Circuit decides to review the case, it seems unlikely that the Board will be able to issue any binding orders until new members are approved by the U.S. Senate.

However this issue ultimately gets resolved, employers might be wise to take a few steps to protect their interests while uncertainty reigns. First, it is essential that employers preserve their challenges to the Board’s quorum. As a practical matter, that means explicitly arguing in every written submission to the Board that it lacks any authority to resolve the case. Second, in the face of an adverse ruling from the Board, consider whether it makes sense to appeal the decision to the D.C. Circuit. As long as the D.C. Circuit’s recent ruling remains controlling law, it is unlikely that the D.C. Circuit will enforce any decision from the Board.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights