Employment Law Compliance Is Just the Beginning

22 April 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Complying with the law is only the starting point when making sound and legally defensible employment decisions, such as discipline, terminations, denying accommodations, and so forth. Have you ever heard of a company that made an employment decision that technically complied with the law, but were still sued by an employee or settled a lawsuit? Do you want to rule in favor of the employee or employer if an “at-will” employee was fired after 30 years of service to the company for a minor violation of the attendance policy, even though the employee was injured on the job, has a medical condition, and a good performance record? Does your opinion change in the context of an at-will employee who was late numerous times, warned on numerous occasions, caused customer complaints, and was mediocre at best with respect job performance?

There is no law or legal burden of proof requiring the employer to evaluate whether it looks like the villain or the victim or to consider real world and reasonable expectations of acceptable employment behavior, but those are key questions to consider when making employment decisions, especially high-risk employment decisions that may result in litigation. Why?

The people who resolve or decide employment disputes and litigation (judges, juries, arbitrators, investigators) are just that… human beings with personal experiences and viewpoints of fairness and acceptable employment behavior, and they are faced with conflicting stories and evidence to determine who is right and wrong. Opposing counsel also evaluates lawsuits based on whether their client (the employee) appears sympathetic to a judge or jury or was the victim of an employer who enforced the letter of the law, but not the spirit of the law. Thus, if the company can show it was the real victim in light of the employee’s misconduct and the company is upholding reasonable expectations of acceptable employment behavior, the company’s chances of winning the lawsuit or preventing the lawsuit are much better. Accordingly, here are three general pointers that may help you defend against employment litigation: (1) comply with laws, (2) show and document that the employer was a “victim,”
and (3) enforce reasonable expectations of acceptable employment behavior.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services