Crowdfunding: Is It for You? Maybe Not.

27 July 2013 Privacy, Cybersecurity & Technology Law Perspectives Blog

Crowdfunding is increasingly popular and effective for certain types of businesses. The producers of a Veronica Mars movie raised over $2m in ten hours, and Cloud Imperium Games raised over $10m for its upcoming Star Citizen game. Crowdfunding works for these ventures because the producers or game makers have tangible items or services that people receive for their donation.  Movie producers may be selling DVD copies or t-shirts and the game companies may be offering advance copies and special downloads. They are not, however, selling stock or any share of any profits, which would violate state and federal securities laws.

This distinction is an important one for entrepreneurs who are looking to raise capital but who can’t currently take advantage of crowdfunding because their products are a long while off or because they do not have the name recognition to sell t-shirts or ancillary products. What these entrepreneurs have (and have always had) is stock.

Permitted crowdfunding of securities looked to be on its way in last year when President Obama signed the JOBS Act, which included a provision to legalize the sale of securities through crowdfunding Websites. The SEC has still not issued its rules which would put the crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act into effect. Even when the rules are in place, crowdfunding still might not be the best option for start-up companies for many reasons, including:

  • A proposed crowdfunding cap of $1m in any 12 month period;
  • A proposed cap on the amount any individual person can invest via crowdfunding (10% of net income for those making $100k or more per year and 5% for those making less than $100k a year);
  • A proposed disclosure filing required to be made with the SEC at least 21 days prior to a crowdfunding (including scaled financial disclosure and a requirement for audited financials for companies raising over $500k);
  • A proposed ban on advertising or other solicitation outside of the SEC licensed crowdfunding site;
  • Proposed post-financing annual and other filings to be submitted to the SEC; and
  • Proposed required due diligence, including background checks on management and large stockholders.

These proposed requirements may make crowdfunding a start-up more time consuming and expensive than desired, especially given the new rules which allow companies to use general advertisements when selling stock in non-crowdfunding situations.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

The DOL Tries to Say Goodbye—And Seriously, We Mean It—to the 80/20 Rule for Tipped Employees
21 October 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
To Stalk or Not to Stalk . . . That Is the Question – Using Social Media for Applicant Review
21 October 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
New Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Updates Seeks Examination Predictability
21 October 2019
Legal News: Intellectual Property
Cryptocurrency in China is like BIG BROTHER in 1984!
20 October 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.