GUEST BLOG: No Copyright Infringement for Skipping Ads

26 July 2013 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel


Barry Barnett has been a Guest Blogger in the past, his Blawgletter provides great thoughts, and insights. I read his blogs regularly. Over the years Barry and I have had a number of cases together and he is an outstanding trial partner at Susman Godfrey.

You Have the Right to Skip Fox Ads, Ninth Circuit Rules

Rupert Murdoch’s TV empire in the U.S. has lost its bid to stop you from avoiding the ads that Fox embeds in its shows — yourGlees, your The Simpsonses, and your So You Think You Can Dances.

The Ninth Circuit turned back Fox’s appeal of an order that denied its motion to enjoin Dish from providing its PrimeTime Anytime recording feature to subscribers. Fox Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Dish Network, L.L.C., No. 12-57048 (9th Cir. July 24, 2013).

Fox argued that Dish had promised in its rebroadcast license not to let subscribers fast-forward through ads and not to make Fox content available "on demand". Fox also claimed that PrimeTime Anytime resulted in both direct and secondary infringement of Fox’s copyrights in its programming content.

The panel held that Fox hadn’t proven infringement of its copyrights by Dish. Subscribers — not Dish — made copies of the Fox shows by flipping a switch, the court noted. That meant Dish did not infringe directly. Nor did Dish’s conduct make it guilty of secondary infringement. Because the subscribers made copies mainly for "time-shifting" purposes, the panel ruled, they had a valid "fair use" defense, and their fair use also exonerated Dish.

The contract issues vexed the panel more. The ruling against Fox turned on a squinty view of what "distribute . . . on an interactive, time-delayed, video-on-demand or similar basis" means. Does giving subscribers a chance to copy and replay Fox content amount to distributing it on a "basis" "similar" to "time-delay[]" or "video-on-demand"? The panel didn’t decide, but it hinted that it very well might.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services