S.B. 734 Allows Captive Insurers in Texas

01 July 2013 Publication
Authors: Kimberly A. Yelkin

Texas Lawyer

While many good bills often fall victim to the waning 140-day clock of any Texas legislative session, S.B. 734 is one measure that withstood the test of time during the recent 83rd Session. This business-friendly insurance bill survived, thanks to the support of several Fortune 500 companies seeking to form captive insurers in Texas.

A captive insurer, or "captive," is a subsidiary that a parent company organizes to insure the risks of the parent or its affiliate. Essentially a form of self-insurance, captives began proliferating the U.S. insurance market in the 1950s when traditional lines of insurance became either too expensive or hard-to-come-by. The term "captive" was coined to emphasize that the subsidiary must be "held captive" by the parent — prohibiting it from undertaking third-party risk.

Prior to the passage of S.B. 734, effective Sept. 1, 2013, Texas did not have a captives law. Thus, any Texas-based company currently utilizing a captive domiciles its captive in another captives-friendly jurisdiction, and then operates in Texas by paying premium taxes charged to unauthorized insurers.

Read More.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ