JOBS Act Private Placement Rules: Pros and Cons for Your Offering

15 August 2013 Innovative Technology Insights Blog

On June 10, 2013, the SEC put into effect provisions of the JOBS Act intended to make it easier for companies and funds to conduct private placements by issuing final rules allowing for general solicitations and general advertisements in the sale of securities. The rules go into effect on or about September 23, 2013.

Before the rule change, no company or fund could advertise a sale of stock or other securities on the radio or television, in print advertisements, or on the internet. These were formerly thought of as public offerings, and the only type of public sales the SEC allowed were traditional public offerings, which are expensive and require a number of public filings with the SEC, audited financial statements, and a whole lot more. The new rules allow for general public advertisement so long as the company or fund takes “reasonable efforts” to make sure that they only actually sell the securities to “accredited investors” (individuals who meet the SEC rules intended to ensure that they have the money or experience to make, and possible lose, their investments).

The extent to which companies will need to do additional background work to satisfy the “reasonable steps” requirement is now heightened, especially when the investor is an individual. For instance, the SEC provided some guidance that, for individuals, companies are likely to be able to satisfy the “reasonable steps” requirements by obtaining bank statements and tax returns or by obtaining certifications from accountants, attorneys or financial planners. A simple investor questionnaire or list of representations and warranties signed by the investor may no longer be enough. Considering that the additional background work may result in a chilling effect on investors, companies will need to consider carefully whether taking advantage of the new rules makes sense.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.