UAW Re-Establishing Importance by Opening Doors With Foreign Carmaker in the U.S.

23 September 2013 Dashboard Insights Blog

Union membership has been in a steady decline for decades, reaching, according to a N.Y. Times article, a 97-year low. While much of the perception and general opinion for the sharp decline in 2012 (from 11.8% to 11.3% of the workforce according to the recent Bureau of Labor Statistics release) was due to the limitations placed on public sector unionization and unions in Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan, the automotive industry has contributed steadily to the union workforce reduction. All that may, however, be about to change, as Volkswagon and the United Auto Workers are said to be engaged in discussions wherein the union is bidding to represent automotive workers at VW’s Chattanooga, TN plant. And, VW management at the plant appears to be supportive.

According to a letter from Frank Fischer, chief operating officer and manager of the Tennessee plant, “. . . Volkswagon has started a dialogue with the UAW in order to check the possibility of implementing an innovative model of employee representation for all employees.” The “innovative model” referenced is supposedly based on VW’s German-style works council approach, used in VW’s German factories with union IG Metall, which represents VW’s workers in Germany. According to the UAW’s regional director in the Southeast, Gary Casteel, the German-style works council approach has never been tried in the United States.

Should the VW-UAW experiment work, UAW may be re-establishing its importance in the automotive industry by gaining a foothold in foreign car manufacturer plants in the U.S., facilities which have remained union-free for the most part.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services