Free Webmail May be Coming to an End as Yahoo! is Sued for Scanning eMails

04 October 2013 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

In the wake of the Google class action for scanning gmail and violating the Federal Wiretap Act, a new class action suit was filed against Yahoo! for “…unlawful, wrongful, and intentional reading and/or learning of the contents.” The class action was filed by John Kevranian and Tammy Zapata on behalf of Yahoo! email users on October 2, 2013 in the US District Court in the Northern District of California based on claims of:

...eavesdropping upon or recording Plaintiffs’ and Class Members’ communications, in violation of California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal. Penal Code § 630, et seq., and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (“ECPA”) [Federal Wiretap Act]

Specifically the lawsuit alleges that Yahoo!:

…intentionally and as part of a common practice, reads, scans, processes, copies, acquires content from, makes copies of content from, creates or gathers data and information from the content of e-mails. Yahoo!’s practice of intercepting the content of e-mails, as described above, includes any and all e-mails sent by Plaintiffs and Class Members from non-Yahoo! e-mail accounts or platforms to Yahoo! Mail recipients. Yahoo! performs these actions in order to read, attempt to read, understand, eavesdrop upon, intercept, or to learn the content or meaning of the e-mails. Further, Yahoo! makes copies or records all or part of e-mails sent by Plaintiffs and Class Members to Yahoo! Mail recipients.

If either Google or Yahoo! lose one of these lawsuits free webmail may end, or more likely the laws may change to permit free webmail services to scan email.
 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

Hatch Comments on DNC-Related Construction Projects in Milwaukee
14 June 2019
Milwaukee Business Journal
Bernard Quoted on Debt-Relief Settlement with ITT Tech Lender
14 June 2019
Wall Street Journal
Dodd and Daughter Profiled in Wisconsin Golf
13 June 2019
Wisconsin Golf
Brinckerhoff Comments on SCOTUS Ruling in Patent Case
11 June 2019
Intellectual Property Magazine
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI