EU Antitrust Claims Plague Google

07 January 2014 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Search engine competitors in the EU released an e-konomica report critical of Google’s October 2013 settlement offer claiming it provides “a way for the company to grow its advertising revenues by increasing paid advertising space and decreasing space dedicated to organic search results.”  The Wall Street Journal reports that Google accounts for about 90% of the EU searches which led to anti competitive complaints 3 years ago by Google’s EU competitors which include a group led by Microsoft known as the Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (ICOMP).  In December 2013 ICOMP released the e-konomica report, and ICOMP’s attorney David Wood made this comment about Google’s settlement offer:

These proposals cleverly disguise a new revenue stream as a solution to its market dominance.

Computerworld reported that EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia told Spanish radio station Radio Nacional de EspaA+-a that Google settlement offer is “…not acceptable in the sense that they are not proposals that can eliminate our concerns regarding competition and in particular regarding the way Google’s rivals in vertical search are being treated.”

Nonetheless the Wall Street Journal reported that “Commissioner Joaquin Almunia has said that he still hopes to reach a settlement by next spring.”  Google and the EU would prefer a settlement since otherwise Google could be fined “10 percent of its annual global revenue.”

Although this EU antitrust action is moving slowly, it is important to follow since the consequences to Google could be enormous.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights