FMLA and ADA: The Brad and Angelina of Employment Law

24 February 2014 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

An employee comes to your human resources department to request Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) leave for an upcoming surgery to address his longstanding back pain, which has caused him increasing difficulties at work. You determine that the employee is eligible for FMLA leave – he worked at least 1,250 hours over the past year and his medical condition will require a period of hospitalization, which makes it a “serious health condition” qualifying for FMLA protections. Once he has submitted a completed medical certification, you grant the employee’s FMLA request and provide him with an FMLA designation notice. Are you done? Not necessarily.

When an employee requests FMLA leave for his own serious health condition, an employer may also want to consider beginning the interactive process required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) to evaluate whether the employee is disabled and may require a reasonable accommodation separate and apart from leave under the FMLA. This is particularly true when an employee indicates that his condition may impact his work performance beyond his need for FMLA leave. To begin the interactive process, the employer may want to consider:

  • Discussing with the employee, and potentially the employee’s medical provider, information regarding his diagnosis, prognosis, and potential work restrictions upon his return to work;
  • Asking the employee to identify his doctor and tell the employee that it will send a letter to that doctor seeking this information; and
  • Explaining that it is the employee’s responsibility to ensure that his doctor provides this information in a timely manner.

After having this conversation with the employer, the employer could also:

  • Send a letter, with the employee’s knowledge, to the employee’s doctor asking for his diagnosis, prognosis, and any potential limitations that would prevent him from meeting the requirements of his position upon his return to work;
  • Enclose a copy of the employee’s position description to allow the doctor to evaluate whether the employee’s condition will prevent him from meeting the requirements of his position when he concludes his leave; and
  • Send a copy of this letter to the employee and retain a copy in the employee’s medical file.

Once the employer receives the doctor’s response, it should work with the employee to determine whether, at the conclusion of the leave, the employee has a disability requiring accommodation and if so, evaluate with the employee whether an accommodation exists and whether that accommodation is reasonable.

Beginning the interactive process at the time of an FMLA leave request can be helpful for two reasons. First, the ADA requires an employer to work with an employee to evaluate the need for an accommodation once it is on notice that the employee may have a qualifying disability that may impact his ability to meet the requirements of his position. The information given by an employee in the context of an FMLA leave request may be sufficient to provide this notice. Second, it is not uncommon for an employee to either return to work with significant restrictions or require additional time off of work after exhausting his FMLA leave. Whether the employee qualifies for ADA protections impacts an employer’s options in responding to these situations. If an employer has already determined that the employee’s condition does not qualify as a disability – which can be a risky proposition – it may deny any requested accommodations and discipline/terminate an employee that does not return to work after exhausting his FMLA leave. By contrast, a disabled employee is entitled to a reasonable accommodation, which may include additional time away from work in excess of his FMLA entitlement. By beginning the ADA interactive process at the outset of an FMLA leave, an employer may avoid delays in addressing medical limitations that persist after the employee’s FMLA leave has been exhausted.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ