Xcel Announces RFP for 150 MW of Solar

19 March 2014 Renewable Energy Outlook Blog

Solar project developers and investors should mark their calendars for April 15, 2014, when Xcel Energy plans to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for up to 150 MW of solar generation. The RFP is needed because Minnesota enacted a Solar Energy Standard last year, which mandates that at least 1.5% of investor-owned utility total retail electric sales come from solar energy by 2020 (10% of the 1.5% requirement must be met with systems ≤ 20 kW). The goal is to increase this amount to 10% by 2030. Minnesota is one of the leading states in promoting renewable generation, and the Solar Energy Standard is not just a carve-out for solar within Minnesota’s existing renewable portfolio standard (RPS), but in addition to the RPS, which requires that at least 20% of electric sales originate from renewable energy sources by 2020, and 25% by 2025 (for Xcel Energy, these percentages are 25 and 30, respectively, due to its nuclear generation fleet).

Xcel accounts for approximately half of Minnesota’s retail electric sales and estimates it will need approximately 300 MW of new solar capacity to meet the Solar Energy Standard. Xcel believes that in order to attract project developers it is imperative to act quickly before the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is reduced from 30% to 10% on January 1, 2017. The ITC has been the primary driver of solar project development and many industry experts believe it is absolutely essential that it is renewed in order to continue promoting renewable generation, diversifying the country’s energy supply, and maintaining job growth within the industry. Nevertheless, Xcel is dividing its 300 MW requirement into two separate RFPs, one now and one after the expiration of the ITC, in order to promote more stable phased-in growth and gauge the level of interest towards allocating more of its generation portfolio toward distributed solar projects in the second RFP.

Xcel will not compete directly in this RFP, but may be interested in participating through a partnership with a third-party. Proposals are due June 1, 2014, and selected projects will be submitted to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in October 2014. Investors and developers should stay tuned for the second round 150 MW RFP in 2017/2018. Xcel’s filing notifying the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission of its intent to issue the RFP is available here.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA