Suppliers Positive, Again, per OESA Survey

22 May 2014 Dashboard Insights Blog

OESA recently released its Automotive Supplier Barometer for May 2014, Focus on Production, Technology, Globalization. Suppliers continue to hum along in their positive attitudes, sending OESA’s May Supplier Sentiment Index (SSI) to 59, a light increase from that of 56 in March 2014. In fact, the SSI has been on the positive side of the spectrum since November 2012. Astonishingly, this is 18 months of positive outlook from Automotive Suppliers. The positive outlook is not surprisingly considering that capacity utilization rates hit upwards of 80-95%.

While positive, suppliers did note risks and challenges. Chief among these was a lack of engineering talent. By more than a two-to-one margin, 37% of suppliers identified this as the number risk to new product launches. A distant second was production capacity and technology development. When asked which system area had the most significant supply chain constraint, suppliers fingered “Electrical/Electronics.” They noted that such products were so scarce that they feared “possible allocation” in the foreseeable future. Lead-times for some suppliers for these key components were going out to 20 weeks, or more.

When asked about their long term sourcing strategy for North America, suppliers echoed a common theme in the manufacturing industry: re-shoring and localization.  Suppliers stated that they wanted to localize production and supply base further in the southern US and Mexico. They wanted to decrease their reliance on overseas sources, in particular, moving sourcing from Asia back to North America.  As one supplier stated in response to the survey, “We will continue to source within North American whenever possible.” Another was even more blunt, “Domestic sourcing only, as unreliable vendors net a cost increase from countries like China and India.”

Lastly, it will be no surprise that suppliers have been impacted by the increased number of recalls. As foreshadowed right here in the Dashboard, the recalls are impacting suppliers. In particular, product and process validation have been heavily impacted according to the survey. Proactive suppliers are increasing their review of their terms and conditions with customers and their down-stream suppliers. The engineering talent shortage is also impacted by the recalls as more employees are forced to divert their attention from their regular jobs to assist with defect investigations, warranty analysis and recall management.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Does The U.S. Need STRONGER Patents?
16 July 2019
PTAB Trial Insights
California Establishes Fund to Combat Wildfire Threats
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
There’s No Place Like Home – But Is That a Reasonable Accommodation?
15 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ