Auto Parts Investigations Require Effective Antitrust Compliance Programs to Limit the On-going Risk

30 June 2014 Dashboard Insights Blog

Steady as clockwork, auto parts investigations around the globe are continuing. These investigations have exposed wide-ranging price fixing conspiracies. Prosecutors rely on well-organized global enforcement cooperation, sophisticated electronic surveillance, leniency/amnesty plus programs and private damage actions. The toll in fines, imprisonment and damages goes on and on, ever higher. This train wreck was avoidable. There is still time to reduce the risk of further fallout. The adoption of effective antitrust compliance programs is essential to prevent the occurrence of such problematic activity in the first instance.

There are globally hundreds of investigations and proceedings  – in the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan, Korea, Australia and China. To date, fines and penalties exceed several billion dollars. Substantial jail time for dozens of individuals, many foreign nationals, is now routine. The United States has successfully extradited a foreign executive for violating U.S. antitrust laws. More extraditions are threatened. These investigations and the ensuing fallout will continue for years to come.    

Now, the investigation process seems almost self-sustaining. Immunity, leniency and leniency plus policies are used to widen the net of suspected criminal activity. Evidently, there are ever-present incentives for companies to disclose what appears to be an apparent unending stream of industry groups that have engaged in criminal cartel activity. Sometimes, there is a literal a race to the enforcement authority’s door to blow the whistle on yet another industry, other companies and culpable individuals.

There is absolutely no excuse for a company to be caught up in cartel activity. The problem needs to be addressed at its roots. Companies need to stop illegal conduct before it begins. This means making compliance effective and compliance audits a number # 1 priority. A well-organized and thoughtfully implemented compliance policy is essential. 

How is effective compliance achieved? “Best practices” elements are well known. A commitment to compliance must begin at the top with the board of directors and senior management. Compliance will not occur unless there is a culture of compliance – doing the right thing – that forms the company’s business culture. This means clear cut and well-communicated compliance policies, training and procedures. These compliance principles must be tailored to the company and its industry. 

Take action now. An effective competition compliance program can hopefully avoid cartel activity from occurring and, in any event, will help reduce the sanctions that would be imposed if, despite the company’s best efforts, a problem arises.

An article on this topic by Howard W. Fogt was published in the Summer 2014 edition of MotorWorld and is available online.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Does The U.S. Need STRONGER Patents?
16 July 2019
PTAB Trial Insights
California Establishes Fund to Combat Wildfire Threats
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
There’s No Place Like Home – But Is That a Reasonable Accommodation?
15 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ