Hospitals Urging SCOTUS to Limit False Claims Act Penalties

07 July 2014 Health Care Law Today Blog

What do a moving company and a hospital association have in common? The False Claims Act (FCA). 

The American Hospital Association along with the United States Chamber of Commerce and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America recently submitted an amici curiae brief in support of petitioners, Gosselin World Wide Moving, urging the Supreme Court to bar excessive FCA penalties. Large penalties under the FCA are of concern to business that contract with the government as well as entities that participate in Federal Health Care Programs.

The FCA creates liability for treble damages plus a civil penalty of $5,000 to $11,000 for each false claim submitted. The question is whether the Fourth Circuit erred in finding that the FCA requires imposition of a separate penalty for each invoice submitted to the Government. The Fourth Circuit held that a $24 million FCA penalty was not excessive, although damages were not proven at trial and the government had paid $3.3 million for the services in question.

Amici argue that the FCA creates “irrationally large” penalties that do not fit the severity of the harm done to the Government and are instead a repercussion of how the Government’s invoicing process that is imposed on contracting parties.  There is a division among lower courts regarding how to calculate FCA penalties.

With an increasing number of FCA cases being brought each year by relators and with a large number focused on the health care industry, hospitals and other health care providers will want to see whether the Supreme Court weighs in on this issue.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services