Does P.F. Chang’s Have Cyber Insurance? Because the GCL Carrier Won’t Pay for Cyber Intrusions

11 November 2014 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

A recent lawsuit by Travelers “that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify P.F. Chang’s under Commercial General Liability [GCL] insurance policies issued by Travelers.” Travelers alleged that among things P.F. Chang’s has “separate cyber liability insurance policy that Travelers did not issue” in its Declaratory Judgment Complaint  filed on October 2, 2014 in the US District Court in Connecticut.

My friend Judy Greenwald reported in

According to litigation filed against the restaurant chain, a breach occurred that involved seven million customer credit and debit cards began on Sept. 18, 2013, although P.F. Chang’s was not notified of it until June 10, 2014. One lawsuit has been filed in Washington and two in Illinois, according to the Travelers litigation, The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut vs. P.F. Chang’s China Bistro Inc.

The litigation against the restaurant chain, which was filed in June and July and seeks class action status, accuses P.F. Chang’s of failure to prevent the breach, and states it could have been prevented. Charges against the chain include breach of implied contract.

It will be interesting to follow this case to see how the Court views the CGL coverage.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services