Growing Use of Vehicle Monitoring Devices Fuels Increase in Privacy Concerns

04 December 2014 Dashboard Insights Blog

In recent years, companies in the United States and abroad have increasingly turned to vehicle tracking devices and remote shut off devices to offer lower priced insurance products and auto loans to higher risk borrowers. On the insurance side, these products may be as simple as tracking the mileage of vehicles for “pay-as-you-drive” products, or may track the hours during which consumers drive, their speeds, and their driving habits for “safe driver” discounts. For auto loans and car sales, products range from GPS devices to remote starter-interrupt devices, allowing lenders to remotely disable vehicle ignition. The type of data gathered by these devices also continues to expand over time. Media outlets from Bloomberg to the New York Times have published recent stories about these and related technologies, further driving consumer awareness of vehicle monitoring devices.

Law enforcement agencies have also used car tracking devices in several high profile investigations. In one recent story, a car dealership had implanted a GPS device on a suspected kidnapper’s vehicle when they sold him the vehicle. After an employee recognized the suspect on the news, the police apprehended the suspect by tracking his vehicle.

However, the increasing awareness of these products has also spawned an increase in privacy concerns over the devices. Earlier this year, the European Parliament passed regulations mandating installation of an eCall system in new vehicles. The eCall device would transmit the vehicle location to emergency services in the event of an emergency or crash, whereas the event data recorders, like “black boxes”, record information about the vehicle. The Directorate General for Internal Policies highlighted the privacy concerns in the regulations and with the event data recorders that will be installed in the vehicles, and recommended changes to the regulations to address these concerns. The ACLU has likewise voiced privacy concerns for technology such as license plate readers, GPS trackers, and even cell phone location tracking.

As vehicles become increasingly connected, and vehicle monitoring devices are used for a broader range of products and services, companies should be aware of the increasing spotlight on privacy concerns with these devices in the U.S. and abroad.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA