Providers and Purchasers Should Be Aware of Health Insurers’ Efforts to Pass Through Affordable Care Act Taxes and Fees

01 December 2014 Health Care Law Today Blog

As health insurers are beginning to operationalize the requirements of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), they are increasingly attempting to pass new expenses, taxes and payment cuts through to contracting providers and purchasers. In doing so, it is becoming increasingly clear that, when negotiating contracts, including participation agreements and purchasing arrangements, providers and purchasers must insist on detailed definitions that clearly allocate responsibility in order to provide predictability and avoid future disputes. In this post, we describe two ACA programs have recently created tensions between health insurers and providers and/or large employers and other purchasers.

Most recently, this has come to light in the implementation of the Risk Adjustment Program of the ACA (the “Program”). Section 1343 of the ACA directs States to operate a risk adjustment program that includes all non-grandfathered plans in the individual and small group market intended to spread the financial risk borne by issuers evenly in order to stabilize premiums. Under the Risk Adjustment Program, payments are transferred from issuers with relatively lower-risk populations to issuers with relatively higher-risk populations. We have seen that as health insurers make payments under the Program, they are attempting to pass the expenses to providers with percentage of premium risk arrangements, by claiming that such payments are deductions or adjustments to the amount of premium actually received, and then proceeding to reduce the payments to providers accordingly.

Most providers, however, are taking the position that Program payments are above the line payments that are the responsibility of the health insurer and are not actually attributable to premiums, of which they are entitled to get a specific percentage. The answer lies in the definition of “premium” in the agreement between the parties. However, in our experience, such definitions are not this granular. Going forward, providers should ensure that such payments are clearly identified as plan obligations. A definition that simply excludes “taxes and fees” may be insufficient.

Another example arises from the implementation of the ACA’s health insurer’s premium tax. Section 9010 of the ACA imposes an annual fee on health insurers, the first payment of which was due in September, 2014. Health insurers have attempted to pass these tax payments across to large employers and other purchasers of insurance, resulting in increased premiums and expenses for the purchasing of insurance. If not addressed in prior years, purchasers should expect health insurers to seek language in new deals intended to pass these costs on. Once again, this requires attention to renegotiations and negotiations of new arrangements, and clear provisions delineating responsibility for payment.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights