Suppliers Should Position Themselves to Mitigate Recall and Warranty Claims in 2015 and Beyond

05 February 2015 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Jeffrey A. Soble Vanessa L. Miller Lauren M. Loew

In 2014, the automotive industry waded through numerous recalls, including recalls against component manufacturers. These recalls include multi-billion dollar recalls spanning multiple vehicle manufacturers. In 2015, the automotive industry will face continued focus on product recalls, warranty issues, and safety procedures. This year, automotive companies should mitigate their exposure to recall and warranty claims by, among other things, revisiting the limitations and disclaimers in their warranties and other risk allocation provisions, and implementing a Corporate Product Safety Program.

Revisit Warranty Provisions

Contract negotiations and disputes in the automotive supply chain often involve questions concerning warranties, warranty disclaimers, limitations on remedies and limitations on damages. Suppliers should consult the following checklist when drafting a contract:

  1. Draft clear and concise express warranties concerning the goods being sold.
  2. As a seller, disclaim the implied warranties and all other express warranties not specifically given in the contract. As a buyer, focus on negotiating the proper express warranties rather than relying on implied warranties.
  3. Sellers will want to limit the buyer’s remedies, such as to repair or replace. Buyers should resist.
  4. Buyers should fight against damage limitations.
  5. Whether a buyer or seller, make sure that the warranties/disclaimers that you give upstream are the same that you get downstream.

The most important focus of any commercial contract should be to capture all aspects of the parties’ commercial relationship in the written agreement. Uncertainty breeds disputes and litigation.

Corporate Product Safety Programs

Corporate Product Safety Programs promote a culture of safety and can identify warranty and recall issues well before they become a multi-million dollar (or greater) exposure for the company. However, a Corporate Product Safety Program is only effective at mitigating risk if the company implements the program in a meaningful way. Key components of an effective corporate product safety program include:

  • A written product safety policy. An effective policy contains a mission statement, details a management and accountability structure for the program, establishes goals that are both measurable and ascertainable, empowers employees to raise safety or defect issues, and is widely disseminated within the company.
  • A Product Safety Committee, led by a Product Safety Manager. The Product Safety Committee is a working group of legal and operational leaders that establishes criteria, best practices, and procedures to support the written product safety policy.
  • Audits and Audit Programs for both manufacturing policies and warranty issues. Audits are designed to identify potential defects before they reach consumers, and to identify problems in the field before they turn into claims

Finally, companies that implement a Corporate Product Safety Program must take steps to protect the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine when legal counsel is involved. A company that implements a Corporate Product Safety Program is not immune from liability for recalls and warranty claims, but companies that take these steps are taking action toward mitigating their future liabilities.

These issues and trends are explored in more detail in our white paper Top Legal Issues Facing Suppliers in 2015.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Hatch Comments on DNC-Related Construction Projects in Milwaukee
14 June 2019
Milwaukee Business Journal
Bernard Quoted on Debt-Relief Settlement with ITT Tech Lender
14 June 2019
Wall Street Journal
Dodd and Daughter Profiled in Wisconsin Golf
13 June 2019
Wisconsin Golf
Brinckerhoff Comments on SCOTUS Ruling in Patent Case
11 June 2019
Intellectual Property Magazine
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI