Why Start-Ups Use Convertible Debt Part I: Common Stock Financing and the Problem of Setting a Valuation

04 March 2015 Technology Transactions Today Blog

Most start-up companies turn to friends, family and/or high net worth individuals as the first source of capital to fund their operations. Banks will not lend to these companies since there are no real assets to collateralize the loans, and most venture capitalists and other institutional investors need to see a further developed company with customers or at least a developed product before they will consider investing. Friends, family and/or high net worth individuals are often more willing to take this early risk.

While there are many ways for a company to structure a financing, the start-up company typically follows one of two paths: 1) the sale of common stock or 2) the sale of convertible debt.

A common stock financing is pretty straight forward. The company puts together a simple purchase agreement that contains basic representations about the company and a statement from the investor that he or she understands that this is a risky investment and has had the opportunity to evaluate the opportunity. The agreement then provides a price per share. Determining the “right” price per share is often a very challenging task for an entrepreneur founder.

Founders believe passionately that their company has tremendous unrealized value, and often try to capture that value in the early stage financing. To demonstrate this, we often ask founders of new start-up companies the following question: if an investor were to offer you $1M today, what percentage of your company would you be willing to give to that investor. The answer we receive is typically 10%. We then explain to the founders that by giving 10% of their company for $1M, they would be valuing their company at $10M.

We then discuss the issues that need to be considered with a $10M valuation. First, most high net worth investors will think the valuation is too high. Start-ups with no customers, no products, no proven management team, and just a really-good idea rarely attain at valuation even remotely close to $10M. A valuation between $500K and $1M would be more typical. However, if the founder were able to secure a $10M valuation, the Company would need to manage the consequence of such a high valuation going forward. That $10M valuation would be the new fair market value of the Company. As such, option grants to new employees and advisors would need to be made that that higher valuation – otherwise, the grant would be a taxable event to the recipient. The Company would also be cautioned against “giving away” founders equity to new key hires. For example, if the Company hired a new CEO and wanted to give him or her founder status and 10% of the Company’s equity for little or nominal cost, that issuance would result in a $1M taxable event to the new CEO. This is because the receipt of 10% of a 10M company for future services would be taxable upon receipt as ordinary income. Finally, any future raise at a valuation less than $10M would be a “down round” and would reflect poorly on the management team, even if they have made great advances in their product and overall operations.

In Part II of our convertible debt series, we’ll explore how a convertible debt financing works.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services