April 1st White House Executive Order to Combat Cyberattacks, for Real or April Fools’ Joke? | Blogs | Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog

The President made the following statement about the Executive Order “Starting today, we’re giving notice to those who pose significant threats to our security or economy by damaging our critical infrastructure, disrupting or hijacking our computer networks, or stealing the trade secrets of American companies or the personal information of American citizens for profit.” The Executive Order was entitled “Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities” and the same day Michael Daniel (Special Assistant to the President and the Cybersecurity Coordinator) posted a blog “Our Latest Tool to Combat Cyber Attacks: What You Need to Know” which described what the Executive Order covered:

Harming or significantly compromising the provision of services by entities in a critical infrastructure sector
Significantly disrupting the availability of a computer or network of computers, including through a distributed denial-of-service attack
Misappropriating funds or economic resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain
Knowingly receiving or using trade secrets that were stolen by cyber-enabled means for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain
Attempting, assisting, or providing material support for any of the harms listed above

However my friend Nick Akerman at Dorsey and Whitney in New York (an expert on cybersecurity and privacy) was interviewed by PCWorld and asked:

What standard of proof are agencies going to use?…It’s not always clear who the hackers are.

The PCWorld article went to say that Nick Akerman:

…praised the Obama administration for calling cyberattacks a “national emergency,” saying such recognition is long overdue, but he questioned how targeted groups will challenge the sanctions.

He also questioned how the Treasury Department and other agencies involved would determine an attack was serious enough to impose sanctions. “Are we just taking the word of the company that was hacked, or are they just going after a competitor overseas?” he said.

Although the Executive Order looks pretty good and well-targeted, and hopefully it will reduce cyberintrusions and cyberattacks. But signing the Executive Order on April 1 date does not sound like the ideal date to issue such an Executive Order particularly given the comments from Nick Akerman…so maybe it will be an April Fools’ Joke after all. But time will tell!

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.