Disruptive Innovation in Law and “The Future of Legal Education: Preparing Law Students to Be Great Lawyers”

01 May 2015 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

On April 24, 2015 I gave a Keynote speech about “Ethical Concerns about Cyber Threats and the Internet” at the Oregon Law Review Symposium on Disruptive Innovation in Law and Technology.  The same day my Oregon Law Review article was published and I encourage you to read “The Future of Legal Education: Preparing Law Students to Be Great Lawyers.”

The Symposium was hosted in the by US District Judge Ann Aiken in the Portland federal court house, and other 5 excellent Keynote speakers at the Symposium were:

Dan Harris – Celebrated international lawyer and a leading authority on legal matters related to doing business in China and in other emerging economies in Asia, founder of Harris Moure, and co-author of the China Law Blog.

Daniel Martin Katz – Internationally recognized legal informatics and legal technology scholar, author, and inventor, pushing the boundaries of legal innovation within Michigan State University’s ReInvent Law Laboratory.

Michael Callier – International lawyer and Legal Process Strategist inside of Davis Wright Tremaine’s research and development department. Researching and developing innovations to increase client value.

Achim Reeb –Management consultant at PROsys LLC and draws upon 18 years of pharmaceutical consulting experience in R&D, Sales, Production, IT and Regulatory Affairs. His experience spans engagements with over a dozen global medical device and pharmaceutical companies to achieve better business performance.

Kelly Reynolds – A law reference librarian at the University of Oregon School of Law.

Many thanks to the Symposium Chair Thomas Mehaffy (graduating this month) who hosted a very thought provoking event.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

Text Messages, EDiscovery, and the New Threat to Privacy
21 November 2019
CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA