Don’t Click “I Agree” for Cloud Services without Considering these Top 3 Cloud Contract Terms!

22 May 2015 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Author(s): Peter Vogel

Too many companies merely accept click agreements for Cloud services without considering what they are committing to, but there are at least 3 terms that cause major problems including “Access to Data, Privacy, and Audits” as I explain in my May 2015 monthly column at eCommerce Times entitled “The Cloud’s Threatening Legal Storm.” Here are the details on those terms:

Contract Term No. 1: Limit Access to Data

The customer’s data must not be used by the cloud provider, and the cloud contract needs to specifically state that limitation. Similarly, the cloud provider must provide the customer a means to verify that the customer data has not been compromised, and that means the contract needs to include the right to audit (discussed below). For instance, make sure that the cloud provider does not use the customer data for its own purposes for target marketing.

Contract Term No. 2: Privacy

Since there are so many different privacy laws around the world, it is critical that the cloud provider specifically specify in the cloud contract how the cloud provider will properly comply. For example, in the U.S., protection of patient records under HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) is mandatory, and any entity holding patient records must be sure that the cloud provider is HIPAA-compliant. Having cyberinsurance for possible HIPAA violations may not be enough to protect liability for failure to protect HIPAA data. Also, laws in the EU (1995 Data Directive), Canada, Japan, Australia, and many other places are significantly different than in the U.S., so the cloud provider must allow customers to understand where their data is stored, and be compliant with local requirements.

Contract Term No. 3: Customer Audits

Although audit rights may seem simple and reasonable, many cloud providers do not permit audits, or they create so many roadblocks that no meaningful audits can be conducted. It is critical that before agreeing to a cloud contract, the customer determine whether it has the right to audit — and if not, either negotiate that provision or select a different cloud provider.

Let me know what you think.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services