Federal Circuit Keeps Sandoz Biosimilar Off the Market for Now

06 May 2015 PharmaPatents Blog

The Federal Circuit is set to hear oral arguments in Amgen v. Sandoz on June 3, but in the meantime has granted Amgen’s motion for a preliminary injunction to keep Sandoz’ biosimilar version of Neupogen® off the market until it renders its decision. Amgen’s appeal relates to the district court decision that denied its motion for a preliminary injunction, and decided that virtually all of the patent dispute resolution provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) are optional. (I wrote about the district court’s decision in this article.)

The non-precedential order granting Amgen’s motion is straight forward:

Amgen Inc. et al. move for an injunction “preventing Sandoz [Inc.] from marketing, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States its FDA-approved ZARXIO® biosimilar product until this Court resolves the appeal.” Sandoz opposes.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted, effective immediately.

(2) The parties are directed to respond concerning what amount of a bond, if any, should be posted for each day that the injunction is in place. Sandoz shall file, within seven days of this order, a document not to exceed 10 pages explaining what amount of bond should be posted. Amgen shall file, within seven days of Sandoz’s filing, a response not to exceed 10 pages. The bond amount will be determined by subsequent order of the court.

The Federal Circuit is reviewing Amgen’s appeal on an expedited schedule, but since this is the court’s first look at the BPCIA it is not clear how quickly it will decide the important issues presented.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services