CMS Releases Final Rule on Medicare Shared Savings Program

16 June 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog

This is the first post in Health Care Law Today’s Series on the final rule.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) released a final rule, on June 4, 2015, addressing changes to its Medicare Shared Savings Program (“MSSP”) Accountable Care Organization (“ACO”) Regulations. The final rule follows a proposed rule released on December 1, 2014. The final rule seeks to encourage continued and enhanced provider participation and to reduce administrative burdens for ACOs participating in the MSSP. Ultimately, the rule provides ACOs more flexibility in their participation in the MSSP. Over 400 organizations are now participating in the MSSP, representing over 7 million beneficiaries.

The final rule is effective on August 3, 2015, with the exception of certain designated provisions that become effective November 1, 2015 and January 1, 2016.

Among the highlights are:

  • Provisions permitting ACOs to renew their participation in the MSSP for a second three-year term without taking downside risk. CMS anticipates that 90 percent of eligible ACOs will renew their participation in the MSSP.
  • Financial modifications to the risk models to encourage ACOs who are ready to take on more risk, with incentives to do so, including introduction of a Track 3 Model with higher risks, higher rewards, and with a prospective beneficiary assignment.
  • Changes in the calculation of the cost benchmarks in a renewal term so that past cost-reduction success does not automatically translate into more difficulty in beating the new lowered cost benchmark.
  • Clarification of guidance related to ACO participant agreements and ACO provider lists.
  • Revisions to the beneficiary assignment algorithm, including updates to the CPT codes that will be considered to be primary care services.
  • Clarification or updates on a number of provisions including:
    • the process to renew a three-year agreement;
    • language that must appear in a participation agreement;
    • expanding the beneficiary identifiable date that is available to ACOs in various reports.
  • Improving participation in Track 3 by offering regulatory relief related to the 3-day stay rule for SNFs.
  • Indicating that CMS will continue to test additional payment rules and other waivers, beyond the SNF 3-day stay rule, for other specified provisions.

Stay tuned for more details on each of these changes published in the CMS final rule.

Please note Foley Summer Associate, Noga M. Benmor-Piltch, was also an author of this post and the Health Care Law Today team thanks her for her for her contributions.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Hatch Comments on DNC-Related Construction Projects in Milwaukee
14 June 2019
Milwaukee Business Journal
Bernard Quoted on Debt-Relief Settlement with ITT Tech Lender
14 June 2019
Wall Street Journal
Dodd and Daughter Profiled in Wisconsin Golf
13 June 2019
Wisconsin Golf
Brinckerhoff Comments on SCOTUS Ruling in Patent Case
11 June 2019
Intellectual Property Magazine
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI