Lawyers Need to Know these 10 Myths about Cyberthreats

09 June 2015 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Since lawyers are guardians of client data it is essential that they be vigilant about cyberthreats and “be more proactive in finding and preparing for threats to physical and digital assets, it’s crucial to define and understand exactly what threat intelligence means, and separate fact from fiction” as reported in Cyvellience recent report entitled “10 Myths About Cyber Threat Intelligence: Separating Fact from Fiction.”  The 10 myths are as follows:

Myth 1: Threat intelligence is just another term for data.

Myth 2: Only big companies have a need for threat intelligence.

Myth 3: It’s impossible to develop a business case and show ROI for threat intelligence.

Myth 4: The volume of sources and data outside our perimeter is too overwhelming to be useful.

Myth 5: Threat intelligence is only useful for the information security department.

Myth 6: I deal with guns and guards, so I don’t need cyber threat intelligence.

Myth 7: Our network is already protected by firewalls, IDS, and anti-virus solutions.

Myth 8: Threat intelligence is only useful before a breach or a security event.

Myth 9: We already have an in-house cyber security team, so we don’t need threat intelligence from a third-party.

Myth 10: We can’t afford to hire more analysts to process, review, and act upon threat intelligence. 

Separating fact from fiction is not always pretty, but with cyberthreats today understanding these myths is critical.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights