Employers Must Continually Monitor 401(k) and Other Benefit Plans

03 August 2015 Publication

Texas Lawyer

It is not just your home and car that need to be continually monitored for defects and needed repairs. A recent U.S. Supreme Court case, Tibble v. Edison International, 135 S.Ct. 1823 (2015), highlights in a unanimous decision that employers who sponsor 401(k) and other employee benefit plans need to continually monitor these plans for compliance with applicable fiduciary standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).

In light of less than unanimous decisions of the Supreme Court in recent high-profile cases dealing with the Affordable Care Act and the granting of tax subsidies for health insurance purchased on a federal exchange, King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. ______ (2015), and same-sex marriage, Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ______ (2015), the Tibble decision certainly leaves no doubt under ERISA’s fiduciary requirements that employee benefit plan fiduciaries must make prudent decisions regarding initial acquisition and also continuing retention of plan investments.

Bottom line, Tibble makes it clear that plan fiduciaries, such as 401(k) trustees and plan investment committees, must continually monitor plan investments for compliance with ERISA’s prudence and diversification requirements.

Read more.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ