Do You Need to Pay Minimum Wage or Overtime to Your Commission-Paid Employees?

21 September 2015 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Companies will sometimes take a chance on a new (or old) salesperson by allowing him/her to work on pure commission. This “eat what you kill” compensation system seemingly creates an incentive to sell with little risk to the company. But is there really little risk? There is a real and potentially expensive risk of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and/or state wage hour law.

As a general principle, the FLSA requires employers to pay an overtime premium of one and a half times the employee’s regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 within a workweek and to also pay at least the minimum wage for all hours worked. However, the FLSA establishes certain exceptions to these requirements. If the employee does not fit within an exception, then the employer must comply with the FLSA.

What exceptions apply to commission paid employees?

  • EMPLOYEES WHO PERFORM WORK COVERED BY THE WHITE COLLAR EXEMPTIONS. These include executives, administrators, and professionals. However, as a threshold, to qualify for these “white collar” exemptions, the employee must be paid a salary of at least $455 per week (that is, until new anticipated new federal regulations become effective that will substantially increase the minimum salary requirement). If this salary test is met, the employee must also satisfy the respective duties test. Some commission-paid employees will satisfy these duties test. A commission paid sales manager who supervises two or more employees might fall under the executive exception. A salesperson who advises the client on the proper product to purchase might be an administrative employee. A lawyer who is paid a percentage of the fees he collects is likely exempt as a professional employee. However, in all instances, the employee must receive a salary (or guaranteed draw) of at least the required weekly amount. By definition then, a pure commission paid employee cannot be exempt under the FLSA White Collar exemptions.
  • OUTSIDE SALES EXEMPTION. To qualify for the outside sales employee exemption, the employee’s primary duty must be the sale of goods or services or the rental of facilities and the employee must be customarily and regularly engaged away from the employer’s place of business. It is this last prong — working away from the workplace — which disqualifies many commission paid employees. If the employee is an outside salesperson, the company need not pay him/her a salary or minimum wage. The typical salesperson who maintains an office at the company’s facility, but is expected to meet with customers, is not generally able to fit under the outside sales exemption.
  • EMPLOYEES PAID COMMISSIONS BY RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS. To qualify under this exemption, the employee must be employed by a retail or service establishment, which are defined as establishments 75 percent of whose annual dollar volume of sales of goods or services (or of both) is not for resale and is recognized as retail sales or services in the particular industry. If the employee works at a retail establishment, then the employer must demonstrate that the employee’s regular rate of pay exceeds one and one-half times the applicable minimum wage for every hour worked in a workweek in which overtime hours are worked, and more than half the employee’s total earnings in a representative period (at least one month and no more than one year) must consist of commissions. If these criteria are satisfied, the employee may be compensated on pure commission with no overtime premiums.

In addition to navigating the restrictions imposed by the FLSA, states are permitted to (and often have) wage hour laws more restrictive than the FLSA. In other words, an exemption under the FLSA will not necessarily constitute an exemption under state overtime and minimum wage laws.

Even though successful commission paid employees often are the highest compensated employees, companies can face huge liabilities for paying only commissions to employees who do not qualify under one of the three narrow exemptions. It is therefore never a bad idea for employers compensating employees on any commission basis – and especially for employees on a pure commission basis – to double check whether they are satisfying the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements for those employees if those requirements apply.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.