Medicare Telehealth Services in Puerto Rico

14 September 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog

As U.S. health care providers continue to use telehealth, telemedicine, and virtual care services to expand their services and geographic footprint overseas, they are beginning to ask whether or not Medicare will cover telehealth services provided to Puerto Rico. Not only is Puerto Rico classified as a Medicare coverage location, but Puerto Rico contains geographic areas that can qualify as originating sites for Medicare telehealth service purposes. Moreover, with the health care access challenges in Puerto Rico, that market may present an excellent opportunity for U.S.-based hospitals and providers to offer telehealth services to Puerto Rico medical institutions and patients, helping solve for the major shortage of medical professionals in the Commonwealth.

Telehealth in Puerto Rico

With more than 3,000 physicians leaving the Commonwealth in an exodus over the last five years, Puerto Ricans are bracing for a crisis in health care. Coupled with cuts to Medicare Advantage plans slated for January 2016, this may lead to higher out of pocket costs for patients, as well as higher costs for hospitalizations and other services. Physician shortages and increased patient payment responsibilities foreseeably reduce in patients seeking and receiving preventative care services designed to manage chronic care and prevent acute inpatient stays. The same holds true for an increased need for specialist physician expertise in Puerto Rico, a service that can readily and easily be offered via telehealth by specialists located at U.S.-based academic medical centers.

Medicare Beneficiaries in Puerto Rico

As of 2012, there were nearly 700,000 Medicare beneficiaries in Puerto Rico, representing approximately 19% of Puerto Rico’s total population and 1.4% of Medicare beneficiaries overall. With some limited exceptions, the Medicare program generally does not cover services furnished outside the United States. However, although Puerto Rico is a territory and its own Commonwealth, Medicare does cover services furnished in Puerto Rico. CMS regulations state, in pertinent part:

The United States includes the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, The Northern Mariana Islands, and for purposes of services rendered on board ship, the territorial waters adjoining the land areas of the United States.

CMS' definition of "United States" means that Medicare covers services provided to beneficiaries in Puerto Rico.

Medicare Telehealth Originating Sites in Puerto Rico

In order for Medicare to cover telehealth services, the beneficiary must be located at a qualifying originating site at the time the service is furnished. An originating site must be located in:

  1. a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) outside of a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or within a rural census tract;
  2. a county outside of a MSA; or
  3. an approved federal demonstration project.

There are many HPSAs in Puerto Rico, including single counties, comprehensive health centers, a correctional facility and HPSA populations. There are also several Puerto Rican counties outside of a MSA. Thus, there is a wealth of geographic areas to serve as potential qualifying originating sites where patients in Puerto Rico can receive telehealth services from physicians at distant sites in the U.S.

Key Takeaway

In light of the health care delivery concerns in Puerto Rico, offering telehealth services may provide greater access to care and improved quality. It also offers a solution for remote locations and locations with shortages of physicians and specialists. Moreover, as Medicare covers telehealth services in Puerto Rico, providers can look to build arrangements in that market knowing there already is at least one third party payer source for the services, while simultaneously exploring other payment sources such as commercial and institutional payments.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.