UAW Continues to Use Strike Threat as a Powerful Negotiating Tool

29 October 2015 Dashboard Insights Blog

In an effort to keep the momentum in its favor, the UAW gave GM a strike deadline of Sunday, October 25, 2015, at 11:59 p.m., to reach a tentative agreement. The UAW’s strategy appears to have worked as the parties reached a tentative agreement shortly before midnight on Sunday. The announcement came just days after the UAW announced its membership had ratified the second tentative agreement reached with Fiat Chrysler. The UAW used a similar strike deadline announcement with Fiat Chrysler to reach the second tentative agreement.

Prior to the vote by the UAW National GM Council yesterday, the UAW kept a lid on specific details regarding the terms of the tentative agreement. The UAW appears to have learned from its failure to control the flow of information related to the first tentative agreement with Fiat Chrysler. Following the Council’s vote, the UAW released details outlining the “significant gains” achieved including $8,000 signing bonuses and an additional $1.9 billion in new investments by GM in U.S. facilities along with the $6.4 billion already announced in 2015.

Voting on the tentative agreement may start as early as tomorrow. We will have to wait and see if the UAW membership at GM ratifies the current tentative agreement or takes a cue from its brothers and sisters at Fiat Chrysler and holds out for more. One thing is for certain, the membership will get the last word as to whether or not the tentative agreement is acceptable.

Stay tuned to Dashboard Insights for further developments regarding the status of the negotiations.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services