But We Need You to Work More Than 40 Hours This Week! Overtime and the Health Care Employer

23 November 2015 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Hospitals and other health care facilities often do not know exactly how many hours each week they may need nurses and other allied health staff to work. Other employees may get sick, have a baby, go on vacation, or patient censuses may spike. From the Emergency Department in a busy inner-city hospital to a burgeoning primary care practice in the suburbs, health care employers may need to request – or require – that employees work overtime.

Though the federal wage and hour law does not restrict health care (or any other types of) employers from requiring employees to work overtime, various state laws around the country do prohibit mandatory overtime by nurses and other health care workers. A recent case out of Pennsylvania is an example of how one hospital was required to pay back pay of $122,000 to a direct care worker it had fired for refusing to work overtime, and also reinstate her to her job.

At trial the direct care worker testified she was the mother of three young children, and she lived with her boyfriend. They worked opposite shifts so they did not have to pay for daycare. When her hospital employer told the direct care worker she had to work overtime, she told them she could not because she did not have anyone to take care of her young children during the time her boyfriend was working. Under the hospital’s policy, it terminated her after she refused four times to work overtime.

The court in Pennsylvania ruled that under the state’s statute prohibiting health care facilities from requiring overtime, the direct care worker had a “public policy” violation claim. Therefore, even though the statute did not expressly allow employees to sue or provide for express remedies for employees who are fired in retaliation for refusing to work forced overtime, the appellate court found she could bring the claim and also keep the $122,000 and get her job back.

Health care employers should also be aware that unions use mandatory overtime as a talking point for their organization efforts. The unions claim mandatory overtime harms patient care and even claim it leads to the shortage of available nurses. Human Resources and legal counsel in the health care industry should take note of not only all state or local laws that may restrict the health care entity’s ability to require overtime but also heed any complaints health care employees make about required overtime. Terminating an employee who complains can lead to costly judgments, and it can also lead to unwelcome attention from unions, or even organizing campaigns.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ