Can lawyers get smarter by using improved Artificial Intelligence (AI)?

11 December 2015 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Since I first learned about AI more than 40 years ago I was hoping that AI would help improve society, and when in studying law I was hopeful that lawyers could use AI.  Recent AI advancements may be the beginning of practical AI since it includes improved Internet search which clearly could help lawyers which would help clients, courts, and society.  A recent report included updated in AI which include “car-safety systems that detect pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as in video game controls, Internet search and factory robots.”

A New York Times December 10, 2015 report entitled “A Learning Advance in Artificial Intelligence Rivals Human Abilities” included a discussion about that the new AI is a “program is capable of quickly learning the characters in a range of languages and generalizing from what it has learned.”  This new approach is:

…known as Bayesian Program Learning, or B.P.L., is different from current machine learning technologies known as deep neural networks.

Neural networks can be trained to recognize human speech, detect objects in images or identify kinds of behavior by being exposed to large sets of examples.

The New York Times report was based on the work of researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, New York University and the University of Toronto which was published in Science entitled “Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction.”

I hope the legal community takes time to consider AI.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights