Happy New Year! What Will Employment Compliance Require in 2016?

04 January 2016 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

They say the future tends to repeat the past. When it comes to employment compliance, this may be especially true.

With the exception of the laws and regulations applicable to federal contractors, not much changed on the federal employment law landscape (except by some case decisions). Rather, most of the changes with respect to workplace rules and regulations occurred at the state level.

Among the new state laws in 2015 that affected employers were:

So, what can we expect for 2016? We can expect further state law expansion of paid sick and parental leaves, additional expansion of “ban the box” rules and regulations, and additional increases in minimum wage limits as most states head toward a $10/hour requirement over time. However, while we continue to expect most changes to occur at the state and local level, there is at least one significant federal change expected for 2016: the increased salary required for maintenance of the Fair Labor Standards Act white collar exemptions.

What does all this mean for you the employer?

First,you must know your state and local laws, and stay vigilant with respect to ongoing developments. If you have operations in multiple states, ask about developments in each state and be cognizant of conflicts between state laws.

Second, be prepared for mandatory paid sick and other forms of leave. To this end, you may wish to consider implementing a paid sick or other leave program now, as most state and local legislation that mandates paid time off (for illness, parenting requirements, and the like) allows employers to take advantage of their own implemented programs (in other words, if you are already providing what the law would require, you are covered).

Third, it may be time to modify your employment application as it relates to inquiries with respect to criminal background history. Although there is no federal “ban-the-box” law in place, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC) has long taken the position that inquiries into an applicant’s criminal history have a disparate impact on minorities and are, therefore, a discriminatory practice.

Additionally, the president recently directed the Office of Personnel Management(OPM) to take action in the hiring process for federal employees by banning the inquiry into criminal history until later in the process. With the expanding state and local legislation banning inquiries into an applicant’s criminal history, employers are better served limiting these inquiries to those safety or other positions where an applicant’s criminal history has a direct correlation to his or her qualification for the position at issue, and making these inquiries only later in the hiring process.

Fourth, and finally, start budgeting now for increasing minimum wage requirements (at the various state levels) and the likely implementation of the modified salary requirements for exempt status. The Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division is expected to publish the final regulations modifying the minimum salary requirement in June or July 2016. As such, employers can expect the higher salary requirement to take effect in late 2016, unless litigation somehow puts a hold on implementation. The salary increase will be significant (the minimum salary to maintain the exemption is estimated to be $50,440 in 2016).

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services