Don’t Forget That Litigation Hold!

22 February 2016 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

When it comes to producing documents in employment litigation, the deck is usually stacked in favor of the employee. Except in those unusual circumstances when the employee is squirreling away documents in an effort to build a case against the employer or where the employee downloaded or otherwise stole documents just before resigning or being escorted out of the building, the employee normally possesses little if any documentary evidence.

The employer, on the other hand, often has a vast amount of documents that can be characterized as relevant to the claim. Courts impose the obligation on all parties to litigation to retain documents, and the consequences for failing to retain documents can be catastrophic. Court-imposed penalties for failure to retain documents have ranged from a reprimand to a monetary penalty to a negative inference jury instruction (instructing the jury to assume that any documents which have been wrongfully destroyed would have supported the employee’s case) to the ultimate penalty – a judgment for the plaintiff. The duty to maintain documents is imposed both on the party and the party’s counsel.

The courts have not provided consistent guidance as to when the obligation to retain documents arises, and in the employment context, this is a particularly thorny issue. While the duty to maintain documents certainly arises when a claim is formally filed with a court, an administrative agency, or pursuant to a grievance/arbitration process, under many circumstances it may arise before then. For example, it might arise when:

  • The employer has sufficient facts to conclude that it is out of compliance with a law and inevitably employees will become aware of such non-compliance and assert a claim
  • When an employee first expresses his belief that the employer violated his rights
  • When a lawyer sends a demand letter

Recognizing the duty to maintain evidence relating to a claim, the tool used to communicate this requirement is known as a litigation hold letter. The litigation hold letter is a letter or memo issued by a person with authority instructing persons who maintain or have custody over relevant documents to preserve those documents. It does not require the retrieval of those documents, but rather the preservation. The litigation hold letter should be addressed to those persons who are a custodian of documents likely to be relevant to the dispute (including but not limited to the Information Technology department), should describe the dispute with sufficient clarity to permit the custodians to determine which documents might be relevant, should instruct the recipients as to potential locations of documents, should give examples of the types of documents to be preserved, and should state the contact information for the person designated to respond to questions.

Given the importance of preserving documents, the person ultimately responsible for compliance should not be satisfied that he has fulfilled the preservation obligations merely by issuing the litigation hold letter. Rather, persons with responsibility for retention of documents must also:

  • Follow up with the custodians to assure that they have properly implemented the hold.
  • Review periodically the substance of the hold letter. Claims change over time and the initial hold letter might not cover claims that were not then anticipated.
  • Review periodically the names of the custodians who were issued the hold letter. Custodians change due to turn-over and changes in positions. Also, as claims change, the custodians often change.
  • Remind custodians at regular intervals of their obligations to maintain records. Often there is a delay between the issuance of the litigation hold letter and when the claim is filed. During such a hiatus, custodians forget about the claim or assume it has been resolved and mistakenly discard relevant documents.

Considering the dire consequences of discarding or deleting documents relevant to litigation, it is important to seek advice of counsel as to when to issue the litigation hold, the persons to inform about the duty to preserve and in addition, it is important to be vigilant in assuring that documents are in fact preserved.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services