Comprehensive Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Program Begins April 1st

07 March 2016 Health Care Law Today Blog

Approximately 800 hospitals in 67 Metropolitan Statistical Areas will begin mandatory participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model on April 1, 2016. The CJR bundled payment program applies to MS-DRG 469 (major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with major complications or comorbidities) and MS-DRG 470 (major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without major complications or comorbidities) and covers all Medicare Part A and Part B services in episodes starting with the hospitalization through 90 days post-discharge, with few exceptions.

The CJR Model is part of CMS’ effort to introduce alternative purchasing models and have 90% of Medicare fee-for-service be in value-based purchasing categories by 2018. The CJR Model is the first program requiring certain hospitals to participate in a value-based program model that includes taking downside risk with respect to the care provided.

Under the CJR Model, a participant hospital serves as the hub and must participate over a five-year term. An episode target price is established for each joint replacement, based on Medicare Part A and Part B covered services, including the hospitalization, physician services, post-acute care through 90 days post discharge with LTACHs, SNFs, home health agencies, hospices, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities, DME, Part B drugs, clinical lab, outpatient therapy and more. Each provider bills Medicare on a fee-for-service basis, with the aggregate Part A and Part B payments compared to the episode target price. As a general matter, averaged over all patients receiving a covered joint replacement at the participant hospital in a year, if all payments come in below the target, after factoring in the government’s discount, the hospital and its contracted “Collaborators” share the upside (gainsharing payments). After the initial year in which there is no downside payment, if all aggregate fee-for-service payments exceed the target, the hospital and its contracted Collaborators are required to repay the excess (alignment payments). There are caps to the gainsharing payment and alignment payment that vary over time, and quality performance affects the payment of savings and repayment obligations.

Key Takeaways for Hospitals

While hospitals are the ones with responsibility, they may share up to 50% of the upside and downside by entering into Collaboration Agreements with other providers (called Collaborators) involved in a covered episode of care. There are specific requirements that must be included in each Collaboration Agreement, including engagement in care redesign strategies and a commitment to quality.

The CJR Model also allows for Medicare programmatic waivers. The CJR Model includes waivers of:

  1. the SNF three-day requirement for a SNF stay in a three-star rated SNF following a hospitalization,
  2. the “incident to” direct supervision requirement for post-charge home visits, and
  3. the geographic site requirement for any service on the Medicare-approved telehealth list.

CMS and OIG have also agreed that certain fraud and abuse laws will be waived under certain specified conditions, allowing:

  1. sharing of gainsharing and alignment payments with Collaborators pursuant to Collaboration Agreements,
  2. Physician Group Practitioners sharing gainsharing payments with its physician collaboration agents, and
  3. the provision of certain in-kind beneficiary engagement incentives provided to beneficiaries, which incentives meet specified requirements.

Hospitals and potential Collaborators will need to understand the CJR Model’s design, the detailed requirements for Collaboration Agreements, and the new compliance issues that the model creates. They also will want to develop strategies for successful participation.

For More Information

Foley is holding a complimentary webinar, on Friday, March 11, at noon central, to provide a further description of the CJR Model and some practical advice related to it. Register here.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services