Liability and Autonomous Vehicles

31 March 2016 Dashboard Insights Blog

As a trial lawyer who handles a lot of automotive disputes and product liability claims, I get asked more and more, “when an autonomous vehicle has an accident, who will be liable?” People – clients, contacts, business associates, partners, friends, etc. all wonder whether the legal system is ready to handle this eventuality. With Google’s self-driving car having suffered an accident recently, these questions are more frequent then ever. While Google allowed that “we clearly bear some responsibility”, the word that struck me was “some.” Google plainly felt that the bus driver was partially responsible as well.

The simple fact of the matter is that these accidents are most likely to be treated no different than accidents that involve two drivers. Your vehicle already has a host of automated features that run on some combination of hardware, software and/or mechanical connections. Your adaptive cruise control. Your lane departure warning. Your automatic breaking. All of these can fail. The software can fail. The sensor can fail. The hardware can fail. If any of them fail, the party responsible for that failure is most likely to be legally responsible.

The same will be true when a driver is in autonomous mode. You think the car literally drives itself magically? No. A combination of hardware, software and/or mechanical connections drive the car. Algorithms that most of us can barely comprehend, let alone understand or explain, are going to make the decisions on how the autonomous vehicle reacts in a given situation. If that algorithm makes a decision that causes an accident, or if it works in a manner inconsistent with an applicable standard of care (most likely debated through expert testimony), then there could be liability.

Key Takeaway

The simple fact is that if there is an accident, someone may be liable, same as it is with non-autonomous vehicles. The one party that will be less likely to be liable is the driver. Driver error is often an issue in vehicle accidents, but should be less of an issue when the vehicle is autonomous.

So, what did Google do in response? Google “made refinements to our software.” Luckily for Google, it may very well have an argument that subsequent remedial measures are not admissible in any dispute.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services