Expansion of Clinical Services at Assisted Living Sites – The New Paradigm

02 May 2016 Health Care Law Today Blog

As payment reforms, such as bundled payments and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), drive further provider collaboration to achieve lower costs with enhanced outcomes, post- acute providers, especially assisted living sites, find themselves at the junction of important strategic decisions. Historically, assisted living was viewed as a “nursing home light” model that allowed aging in place and possible later admission to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Hence, many State laws cap or limit the amount of skilled care that is allowed at assisted living sites. However, the growing consumer preferences for home-like care settings coupled with the search for lower cost care settings from discharge sources has increased the general acuity of clinical care at assisted living sites. Assisted living providers have responded in various ways including developing ancillary home health, hospice, therapy, and pharmacy services as well as partnerships with hospitals and physicians for short term respite care.

Recently, some assisted living trade associations have supported legislation to expand the clinical envelope of allowed care at assisted living sites to include “limited health care services” such as administration of an injectable, wound care, catheter placement, and oxygen therapy. For example, pending legislation in Massachusetts in the form of Senate Bill 2139, which is currently being considered by the legislature’s Joint Committee on Elder Affairs, has supported this approach of allowing limited health care services. Notably, Massachusetts, unlike many other states, does not regulate assisted living facilities as health care facilities, which means that the aggregate resources of the Department of Public Health’s regulatory arm would not have per se authority to regulate the limited health care services offered by Massachusetts assisted living facilities. That dichotomy demonstrates the ongoing debate among assisted living stakeholders regarding the characterization of assisted living facilities as residential, clinical, or somewhere in between.

Assisted living providers seeing an opportunity in this area must balance:

  1. the attractive residential setting of its “core” population, and the reality that the average assisted living resident is frailer now than when assisted living laws were initially promulgated; against
  2. existing regulatory restraints and the opportunity to evolve their model in a way that may very well reflect permanent changes in the health care delivery model.

A good example of the latter is the new bundled payment initiative, which creates a mandatory payment cap (subject to shared savings) for hospitals that includes a 90-day post discharge period of care. Hospitals with costs exceeding a regional cap will be highly incentivized to send patients directly “home” rather than to higher cost settings such as SNFs or IRFs to avoid possible losses. Assisted living may well play a role in this space.

Assisted living operators must take stock of the new payment and delivery models evolving in the health care system, understand these models’ impact, and cultivate a strategy to intelligently participate and succeed in the new health care delivery system.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services