New Cyber rules for DOD contractors may be creating new problems!

21 October 2016 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Law360 reported that many experts are concerned that “companies who share cybersecurity incident information with a DOD contractor will be considered a third-party beneficiary of the DOD, with the ability to sue if confidential information is leaked or stolen, but that offers little solace to those who have their information stolen.” The October 20, 2016 report entitled “DOD Cyber Rule May Create As Many Problems As It Solves” included this explanation:

The final “network penetration” rule, unveiled on Thursday and set to go into effect at the end of 2017, tweaks the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to require U.S. Department of Defense contractors to report to the DOD whenever their networks containing “covered defense information” are breached, part of a broader recent push to improve cybersecurity.

The article includes these comments from Michael Scheimer (at Hogan Lovells):

…the final rule clarifies that contracts for “fundamental research” aren’t considered to involve covered defense information, and also clarifies that it does not cover contracts for commercial off-the-shelf, or COTS, items, both of which are improvements over the interim rules,

Given the daily cyber headlines it is critical that DOD be properly protected, and the rule appear to require more adjustments.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services