Tech & Car Companies Resist California's Proposed Autonomous Vehicle Rules

24 October 2016 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Jeffrey A. Soble

A who’s who of the automotive and tech sector reacted with concern at the state of California’s proposed rules for autonomous vehicles. Among other things, the companies were not happy that what the United States made voluntary, California may make required.

As reported by Reuters, the industry objected to the following:

  • Required vehicle data recorders;
  • A 12-month delay between vehicle testing and deployment on public roads;
  • A proposal that police could obtain self-driving data without a warrant or subpoena; and
  • That local municipalities could set their own rules for autonomous vehicles.

We have to say, that last one seems pretty unworkable. How could it be possible to have every county, every city, every village, every etc. set autonomous vehicles rules throughout the United States? That seems impossible to adhere to for the industry.

California is a big state, and it tends to be a leader on issues similar to these. However, we here at the Dashboard have noted that if California (or any other state) wants to be the leader in getting autonomous vehicles on the road, it needs to establish rules that the industry can follow. Allowing a patchwork of hundreds of rules that change every time an autonomous vehicle crosses a city boundary would certainly hinder the technology itself. What if Los Angeles County decides that autonomous vehicles can have no steering wheel, but Orange County decides that autonomous vehicles must have a steering wheel? Statewide, really nationwide, standards and rules are the best means of fostering and encouraging autonomous vehicle development.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services